2000 Toyota Camry Inner Trunk Tail Light Lamp Right on 2040-parts.com
Garretson, South Dakota, US
Tail Lights for Sale
2003 audi a6 tail lamp light right(US $95.00)
2005 chevy cobalt outer tail light lamp right(US $45.00)
2003 lincoln ls inner trunk tail light lamp upper left(US $50.00)
2005 ford focus tail lamp light left(US $60.00)
2002 chrysler sebring tail lamp light left(US $95.00)
1995 jeep grand cherokee tail lamp light right(US $60.00)
Toyota Prius T Spirit Review & Road Test (2010 / 2011)
Sun, 12 Dec 2010We spend a week with the Toyota Prius There are many – us included – who thought it extremely unlikely that Toyota would ever want to send us any of their hybrid cars for review. Much less – in light of our oft stated dislike of the Prius and all the motoring piousness it represents – let us review the latest Toyota Prius But it turns out that Toyota are a decent bunch of chaps who believe that their cars – even their hybrid cars – are capable of standing up to scrutiny, even with our well known antipathy to the whole hybrid direction. And let’s face it, so entrenched is the Prius as a ‘Planet Saver’ in the minds of many that even if we simply confirm our opinion after a week of playing it’s not really going to make much difference to Toyota.
Automakers sign up to Apple 'Eyes Free' Siri button
Tue, 12 Jun 2012Apple has announced that the leading carmakers have signed up for the addition of an ‘Eyes Free' button that will activate Siri for in-car Apple products. Siri – the innovative voice activation system developed for the 4S, Apple's latest iPhone – can be activated by pressing a steering wheel mounted button and allows the driver to access the same information available when not driving. Apple reported at its 2012 Worldwide Developer's Conference that Mercedes-Benz, BMW, Audi, Toyota, Land Rover, Jaguar, Chrysler and Honda have all signed up to offer Eyes Free within the next 12 months.
Supreme Court decides police need warrant for GPS trackers
Tue, 24 Jan 2012The U.S. Department of Justice just got taken down a peg by the Supreme Court in a victory for privacy advocates. The high court ruled on Monday that a law-enforcement officer affixing a GPS tracker to a person's vehicle without a warrant is in violation of the Fourth Amendment.