Find or Sell any Parts for Your Vehicle in USA

1956 Plymouth Weatherstrip 1681154 Right Rear Door Outer Window Belt Sweep on 2040-parts.com

US $19.99
Location:

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Omaha, Nebraska, United States
NOS made to conform to window, no box or sleeve
Brand:Mopar Placement on Vehicle:Right, Rear Manufacturer Part Number:1681154 Warranty:No

I have a piece of NOS weather seal that I believe is piece number 1681154.  

This was the only weatherstrip that was with a box of trim and there was a computer card for a weatherstrip with this number.  

According to my Mopar parts book this number fits a 1956 Plymouth 4 door. It resembles the pictures in the Parts manual.

This piece is about 31 1/2" long with a small jog in the trim between the 26 1/2 and 27 1/2" mark.

This has felt like a sweep   The felt is shaved down between the 22 1/4" to 27 3/4" reagion as well as between the 1/2" to 1" region, measuring from the front end.

Why buy generic when you can get the real deal.

I'll include the computer card but it has writing on the back when I was trying to ID it.  Please verify it is correct for your application.

Other for Sale

Volvo celebrates the seatbelt’s golden anniversary

Wed, 12 Aug 2009

By Freddie Fulton Motor Industry 12 August 2009 10:11 Today marks the 50th anniversary of the three-point seatbelt. It was patented by Volvo engineer Nils Bohlin in 1959, but the Swedes magnanimously opened up the tech to other car makers as they saw the real-world safety benefit of seatbelts in all cars. The design was so effective that in Germany the patent registrars listed it in the top eight inventions which have made an impact from 1885 to 1985.

Audi Quattro concept (2013) at Frankfurt motor show

Wed, 14 Aug 2013

This is our first look at Audi’s new Quattro concept, the latest evolution of Ingolstadt’s plot to build a flagship super-coupe inspired by its Eighties all-wheel drive icon. However, it doesn’t just look a whole lot more aggressive than the original 2010 Quattro concept – it’s also massively punchier under the skin. What’s new exterior-wise for the 2013 Audi Quattro concept?

CAR tech: who's to blame for your car's terrible fuel economy?

Mon, 12 Aug 2013

In early 2013 Audi lost a case brought by the Advertising Standard Agency (ASA) because of ‘misleading’ fuel economy figures used in an advert, after a customer complained they couldn’t get anywhere near the 68mpg quoted. The court case once more exposes the yawning gap between officially sanctioned mpg figures and those experienced by owners. A recent study by the Independent Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) looked at cars sold in the UK and Europe, and discovered the difference between official mpg figures and real-world driving had grown from 8% in 2001 to a barely believable 21% in 2011.