1964-1970 Full Mustang Fastback, Coupe, Convertible Window Regulator Part on 2040-parts.com
Gainesville, Florida, United States
|
1 of 6 partial pieces to make a complete window regulator. We believe they are from a 1969 Mustang window...but arent 100% sure so we put 1964-1970...GREAT BUY regardless of year...ask for more pictures and well send it for you...you get EITHER of the parts you need....the crank or the holder...either of these 6 parts are $9.95 EACH...
|
Window Parts for Sale
1969 buick skylark two door hard top lower glass window stop oem(US $15.99)
Porsche 356 b c sc new window channel seal! original!(US $18.00)
1948-1949-1950-1951-1952 ford truck vent window rubber seal(US $69.95)
1973-1979 oem drivers side lh door window glass and mount(US $56.86)
1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 side windshield slide mount bracket 1920s 1930s 1931 32
1957 ford 2 door ranch wagon rh sliding glass window latch nos ford 516(US $129.99)
Mazda MX-5 GT: A rather warm MX-5
Wed, 23 Mar 2011The track only Mazda MX-5 GT Back at Frankfurt in 2009, Mazda revealed an MX-5 which had been put on a serious diet – the Mazda MX-5 Superlight – but which was sadly just a concept. And now we get a super-light MX5 that isn’t a concept but also can’t be bought for the road because it’s a track car – the Mazda MX-5 GT. MX-5 lovers the world over weep.
Honda expands recall for faulty headlights
Thu, 04 Oct 2012Honda is expanding a recall launched in March to fix a headlight problem to include the Civic and Pilot. About 820,000 vehicles have been added to the recall, which now covers 2002-2003 Civic sedans and 2004-2005 Pilot SUVs. The problem is with the headlight-wiring system, which could cause the low beams not to work.
Google Glass driver cleared by court
Mon, 20 Jan 2014A WOMAN WHO WAS ARRESTED for driving while wearing Google's new computer-in-glasses device has been cleared of wrongdoing by a court in California. The San Diego traffic court threw out a citation against Cecilia Abadie, with commissioner John Blair ruling she was not guilty because the offence for which was ticketed requires proof that the device was in use. Mr Blair found there was no proof beyond a reasonable doubt.