Find or Sell any Parts for Your Vehicle in USA

1964 65 Chevelle Small Block Chevy 283 327 Alternator Bracket 3840084 on 2040-parts.com

US $64.00
Location:

Marengo, Illinois, United States

Marengo, Illinois, United States
Condition:Used: An item that has been used previously. The item may have some signs of cosmetic wear, but is fully operational and functions as intended. This item may be a floor model or store return that has been used. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections. See all condition definitions Brand:GM Mounting Style:Bolt-On Interchange Part Number:1964 1965 65 Chevelle Malibu El Camino SS small block Chevy SBC V OE/OEM Part Number:3840084 Manufacturer Part Number:3840084 Material:Cast Item Length:6 in Country/Region of Manufacture:United States Universal Fitment:No

Alternator & Generator Parts for Sale

Mitsubishi to kill current U.S.-made lineup, bring in new platform

Thu, 20 Jan 2011

Mitsubishi Motors Corp. plans to kill its current lineup of U.S.-made vehicles, including the Eclipse sporty car and Endeavor crossover, over the next three years and switch to producing global vehicles at its Illinois plant, partly to target export markets. The current nameplates will be phased out by 2014 as part of the carmaker's “Jump 2013” mid-term business plan unveiled Thursday by president Osamu Masuko.

Porsche 911 Turbo Cabriolet (2013) priced from £126,766

Mon, 23 Sep 2013

Meet the new kings of Porsche drop-tops: the new 911 Turbo Cabriolet and Turbo S Cabriolet. The turbocharged soft-top 911s are the fastest and yet most economical of the breed yet, sporting the same twin-blow 3.8-litre flat six as the coupe models, and a 195mph+ top speed. What’s the spec of the new Porsche 911 Turbo Cabriolet?

Ford Fiesta ECOnetic: On the Drive

Thu, 28 May 2009

We test the new Ford Fiesta ECOnetic to see if it's as 'Green' as it seems But how good would it actually be to live with? We all know that headline fuel consumptions can be misleading, but was this new ‘Eco’ Fiesta really all that economical? We’d had numerous emails and comments after that first drive, all saying basically the same thing: Yes, it headlines at 76mpg, but what will it do in the real world?