1990 Buick Reatta Parts Car Plus Extra Good Motor And A Trunk Load Of Parts on 2040-parts.com
Eighty Four, Pennsylvania, US
1990 BUICK REATTA PARTS CAR..PLUS A GOOD COMPLETE ENGINE AND TRANS WITH 120K AND A TRUNK LOAD OF OTHER EXTRA PARTS FROM OTHER REATTAS I HAVE PARTED OUT,..BILL OF SALE ...NO TITLE......GOOD BODY PARTS, SOME GOOD INTERIOR PARTS, GOOD TRANS... NON REFUNDABLE DEPOSIT OF $100 DUE IMMEADIATLY UPON PURCHASE ....CAR MUST BE PICKED UP WITHIN 7 DAYS
1970 to present for Sale
Chevy blazer 1997 for scrap or repair, no reserve(US $0.99)
1970 mustang fastback parts car/good roof(US $450.00)
1971 monte carlo (US $200.00)
1979 super beetle(US $0.99)
1994 s10 blazer 4dr - 4.3 fuel inj great truck needs tlc runs rough sellin cheap(US $500.00)
1999 ford mustang, manual transmission, with bad engine(US $1.00)
Saab (NEVS) loses right to use Saab name – NEVS gets creditor protection
Mon, 01 Sep 2014Saab (NEVS) loses right to use Saab name – NEVS gets creditor protection Just a few weeks ago we reported that Saab and its new owner National Electric Vehicles Sweden (NEVS) were once again up against it with an unpaid supplier filing for bankruptcy. Since the, Saab has been thrown a lifeline by the Swedish courts, and a big kick in the teeth by Saab AB. NEVS right to use the Saab name (although not the Griffin logo) was granted by the owners – the defence firm Saab AB – but in light of NEVS financial predicament that right has been withdrawn.
RAC Foundation – Road charging is inevitable
Tue, 06 Jul 2010The RAC Foundation calls for Road Charging. According to RAC Foundation Director Stephen Glaister, a predicted 33% increase in traffic by 2025 and a reduction in road building schemes and cuts in general make a pay as you go system the answer to congested roads. All of which is fine and dandy – it gives the RAC Foundation something to do and gets them a bit of PR – but it”s hardly joined-up thinking.
Contests Archive: CDN-GM Interactive Design Competition 2011
Thu, 15 Mar 2012The Car Design News - GM Interactive Design Competition was open to design students across the USA and Canada. This was an open, online competition, which was held in the spirit of the web, where data and information are shared and exchanged with ease, and where people could come together to collaborate. In this spirit, the judges were looking to see the contribution the entrants made within the wider online community and how they helped their competition peers. We advised students to engage in dialogue with those who commented on their work, and where they made changes to their design based on feedback they received to illustrate how and why this is so.