1999-2000 Arctic Cat Powder Special 500 Efi Gates G-force C12 Belt Drive Bc on 2040-parts.com
Sacramento, California, US
Clutch & Drive Belts for Sale
2002 ski-doo grand touring 600 gs gates g-force belt drive kevlar aramid kv(US $71.39)
2005 arctic cat firecat 700 efi gates g-force belt drive kevlar aramid qz(US $71.09)
2000-2001 yamaha vx600dx vmax 600 deluxe gates g-force c12 belt drive su(US $119.09)
2002-2007 arctic cat z 570 gates g-force belt drive kevlar aramid ni(US $75.69)
2009 arctic cat tz1 park gates g-force c12 belt drive carbon fiber ro(US $119.19)
2002 arctic cat panther 570 r gates g-force c12 belt drive carbon fiber qg(US $119.59)
Ford set to improve 2013 hybrid software
Wed, 17 Jul 2013Ford said on Monday that it would recall its 2013 Fusion, C-Max and Lincoln MKZ hybrids, but not for the reason you might think. Like your cell phone software, the car’s software systems are getting an upgrade. Starting in August, owners of those cars will be notified of their option to bring the cars in for a software enhancement that will help even out the variability in mileage.
2012 Hyundai i20 Facelift arrives UPDATED
Sat, 03 Mar 2012The 2012 Hyundai i20 Facelift arrives a bit earlier than Hyundai planned The Hyundai i20 Facelift for 2012 has arrived a bit earlier than Hyundai planned, with the first photos arriving ahead of its Geneva debut. Update: Hyundai caught up with the news on the i20 facelift and confirmed the changes. But under the skin they’ve also had a play, with a new 1.1 litre 3-cylinder ‘U-II’ diesel which, when mated to Hyundai’s Blue Drive tech, delivers 74bhp and the lowest emissions of any car on sale with a conventional powertrain at just 84g/km.
Contests Archive: CDN-GM Interactive Design Competition 2011
Thu, 15 Mar 2012The Car Design News - GM Interactive Design Competition was open to design students across the USA and Canada. This was an open, online competition, which was held in the spirit of the web, where data and information are shared and exchanged with ease, and where people could come together to collaborate. In this spirit, the judges were looking to see the contribution the entrants made within the wider online community and how they helped their competition peers. We advised students to engage in dialogue with those who commented on their work, and where they made changes to their design based on feedback they received to illustrate how and why this is so.