Find or Sell any Parts for Your Vehicle in USA

2007 To 2013 Bmw X5 Trunk Hatch Spoiler 7157689 A7067 Oem on 2040-parts.com

US $67.99
Location:

Condition:UsedAn item that has been used previously. The item may have some signs of cosmetic wear, but is fully operational and functions as intended. This item may be a floor model or store return that has been used. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections. See all condition definitions Seller Notes:“Part has scratch pic nr 7” Brand:BMW Interchange Part Number:7177604, 7273446 Sku Number:496627 Manufacturer Warranty:30 Day OE/OEM Part Number:51627157689, 5162-7157689, 5162-7-157-689 Color:Black Fitment Type:Direct Replacement Manufacturer Part Number:51627157689, 5162-7157689, 5162-7-157-689 Tested:Tested, Cleaned and Inspected Compatible Part Numbers:7273446, 7177604

Pagani C9 mule spied

Sat, 06 Feb 2010

The Pagani C9 testing in South Africa - image from Easycarblog A couple of weeks ago we reported that Horacio Pagani had been talking about the new Pagani C9 to the Argentinian press. The C9, in case you didn’t know, is Pagani’s replacement for the Zonda and is due to be revealed alter this year. The Pagani C9 will feature an all new, Mercedes-built 6.0 litre bi-turbo V12 with 700bhp.

Goodwood Festival of Speed (2012) preview

Tue, 26 Jun 2012

The 2012 Goodwood Festival of Speed runs from Thursday 28 June - Sunday 1 July, as Lord March once again throws open the gates of Goodwood House to 150,000 petrolheads. Read on for CAR Magazine's preview of the 2012 Festival of Speed. It's set to be the largest-yet display and demonstration of classic and modern racing cars, world-class drivers, and exotic supercars.

Contests Archive: CDN-GM Interactive Design Competition 2011

Thu, 15 Mar 2012

The Car Design News - GM Interactive Design Competition was open to design students across the USA and Canada. This was an open, online competition, which was held in the spirit of the web, where data and information are shared and exchanged with ease, and where people could come together to collaborate.  In this spirit, the judges were looking to see the contribution the entrants made within the wider online community and how they helped their competition peers. We advised students to engage in dialogue with those who commented on their work, and where they made changes to their design based on feedback they received to illustrate how and why this is so.