95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 Cavalier Loaded Beam Axle Susp Opt Fe0 Fe1 on 2040-parts.com
Rockford, Illinois, US
Axle Parts for Sale
- Mopar oem 5171467ae rear suspension-axle beam(US $254.56)
- Timken seal torque converter acrylate each(US $4.97)
- Timken 513230 wheel hub/bearing assembly each(US $152.97)
- Dorman 13801 hub screw(US $9.96)
- Dorman 13802 hub screw(US $11.21)
- Mopar 8.75 8 3/4 489 case ring and pinion choose 3.55, 3.73, 3.91, 4.10 or 4.56(US $185.00)
A CAR reader’s festival ride in the Jaguar XKR 75
Tue, 06 Jul 2010CAR reader Archie Robertson, from Hertfordshire, won a money-can’t-buy prize at the 2010 Goodwood Festival of Speed thanks to CAR Magazine and Jaguar: an XFR super saloon for the weekend and VIP tickets to Goodwood including an unforgettable ride up the hill. Archie and his wife Judy spent Friday at the Festival of Speed with Jaguar hospitality thrown in. But the highlight of the day was a ride in the new Jaguar XKR 75, sitting alongside Jaguar’s chief chassis guru and driving legend Mike Cross, as he slithered and rocketed up Lord March’s front drive.
Jaguar C-X17 concept (2013) design boss Ian Callum on interior design
Mon, 09 Sep 2013As with all concept cars, the Jaguar C-X17’s interior is the least production-viable element of the entire design, but it does give vital clues to the direction that design boss Ian Callum and his team are evaluating for the future. The focus is on clean, strong, flowing design, one that shuns clutter for pared-back simplicity. Open the door and you’ll notice both the sense of space and the small F-type steering wheel and four individual bucket seats, the latter two elements suggesting a nimble, involving driving experience.
Chrysler loses 'Imported from Detroit' lawsuit
Wed, 29 Jun 2011A federal judge today denied a motion by Chrysler Group LLC to bar use of its "Imported from Detroit" commercial tag line by clothier Pure Detroit, which in turn has formally opposed Chrysler's bid to trademark the phrase. U.S. District Judge Arthur Tarnow ruled that Chrysler's request didn't show that it would suffer irreparable harm or that it had a strong likelihood of winning its case.