Find or Sell any Parts for Your Vehicle in USA

99 00 01 Ford Explorer Engine Control Module Xl2f-12a650-pd on 2040-parts.com

US $14.00
Location:

Walpole, New Hampshire, United States

Walpole, New Hampshire, United States
Condition:Used Manufacturer Part Number:XL2F12A650PD Surface Finish:POWER,CONTROL MUDULE, PCM ,PCU,ECM, ECU Other Part Number:ENGINE CONTROL MODULE, OEM, , BRAIN,UNIT Part Brand:ENGINE CONTROL UNIT , ENGINE CONTROL COMPUTER

FORD EXPLORER ENGINE CONTROL MODULE XL2F-12A650-PD

MATCH THE PART NUMBER BEFORE PURCHASE  THIS WONT WORK IF ITS NOT THE SAME NUMBER

If this does not work i will refund your winning bid, but please check the part number it is very important.

if you find one cheaper on ebay tell me the item number and i will beat the price.

FAST SHIPPING

Survey Reveals Car Use Slump Despite Lower Petrol Prices

Thu, 10 Jul 2014

USUALLY the news that petrol prices are down would be cause for celebration, but the latest AA/Populus survey reveals that car use is also on the slide. Despite more wallet-friendly prices at the pumps the situation is failing to kick-start more car use. The poll of more than 18,000 AA members, conducted in June, revealed that just 7% were more relaxed about prices at the pumps, and were using their car more than a year ago.

Mazda MX-5 Superlight at Frankfurt

Wed, 05 Aug 2009

Mazda has created a stripped-down MX-5 for the Frankfurt Motor Show - The Mazda MX-5 Superlight And it’s achieved its success by being faithful to its origins. It has stayed a small, light, nimble and fun little car. It hasn’t got big and bloated and been boosted by endless power upgrades or sullied by the latest high-tech.

Chrysler recalls Jeeps for fire risk

Tue, 18 Jun 2013

Chrysler has decided to recall 2.7 million 1993 to 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee and 2002 to 2007 Liberty models for a potential risk relating to the fuel tank placement between the rear bumper and rear axle. The recall is initiated 15 days after the automaker originally denied a request following a National Highway Traffic Safety Administration investigation. On June 4, one day after NHTSA's finding, Chrysler rejected the request in a media statement, stating the NHTSA's initial conclusions are based on “incomplete analysis of the underlying data.” Chrysler said the impacted models met or exceeded all applicable requirements of the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, including the ones pertaining to fuel system integrity.