Find or Sell any Parts for Your Vehicle in USA

Cadillac Gm Oem 04-07 Cts 3.6l-v6-catalytic Converter 12622974 on 2040-parts.com

US $924.59
Location:

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Condition:Remanufactured Genuine OEM:Yes Placement on Vehicle:Right core charge:$ 100 Which is included in the total price Fitment Footnotes:Base; Quantity Sold:sold individually Category 1:Exhaust System SKU:104:12622974 Quantity Needed:1 Brand:GM Category 2:Exhaust System Manufacturer Part Number:12622974 Category 3:Exhaust System Part Ref# on Diagram:ONLY PART REFERENCE #4 ON THE DIAGRAM IS INCLUDED Item Name:Catalytic Converter Other Part Number:25767362 UPC:Does not apply

Catalytic Converters for Sale

Toyota Fuel Cell Sedan (2015) revealed: the £40k hydrogen car is here

Wed, 25 Jun 2014

By Tim Pollard First Official Pictures 25 June 2014 13:14 Toyota has revealed the final design for its new Fuel Cell Sedan. It's a 'Ronseal', does-what-it-says-on-the-tin choice of name for the car: it is, indeed, Toyota's hydrogen fuel-cell-powered saloon - and this one is coming to a showroom near you sooner than you think. The H2 car may blend concept car cues with Japanese global design blandness, but the Fuel Cell Sedan is significant as much for the numbers involved as the futuristic look.

Toyota conducted fix of Prius brakes but didn't notify drivers

Thu, 04 Feb 2010

Toyota Motor Corp., under fire from fresh quality complaints about its popular Prius hybrid, says it conducted a software fix to address reports of slipping brakes. But the world's biggest carmaker didn't notify customers at the time of the change. And it says it is still uncertain how to handle the thousands of Prius vehicles that were sold before the fix.

Contests Archive: CDN-GM Interactive Design Competition 2011

Thu, 15 Mar 2012

The Car Design News - GM Interactive Design Competition was open to design students across the USA and Canada. This was an open, online competition, which was held in the spirit of the web, where data and information are shared and exchanged with ease, and where people could come together to collaborate.  In this spirit, the judges were looking to see the contribution the entrants made within the wider online community and how they helped their competition peers. We advised students to engage in dialogue with those who commented on their work, and where they made changes to their design based on feedback they received to illustrate how and why this is so.