Intake Gaskets for Sale
- Bostech isk124 isk124(US $24.96)
- Gm oem throttle body-gasket 12576549(US $46.56)
- Holley 108-7 throttle body gasket(US $8.50)
- Holley 134-73s aluminum center hung "v" bowl kit - secondary with pump(US $88.08)
- Genuine nissan oil inlet tube gasket 15189-ez41a(US $26.97)
- 059130519b fuel injector o-ring for audi a4 - a8 q5 vw touareg genuine part new(US $23.00)
Koenigsegg planning an entry-level car – but it’ll still cost £500k
Sat, 26 Apr 2014Koenigsegg are planning an entry-level car at half the price of the Agera R (pictured) Think of the cars that Christian von Koenigsegg has made since he started with the CC8S in 2002 and you think of them as extremes of the supercar genre; the Swedish engineering take on the bloated and massively complex Bugatti Veyron. Christian’s men in a shed in Sweden have gone on to make a series of progressively quicker and more impressive supercars, through the CCR, CCX and the Agera and on to the current most extreme iteration – the Koenigsegg One:1. But it looks like Christian has decided that his ambition to create the world’s greatest hypercar leaves room for a ‘Lesser’ Koenigsegg, a car that still has innovative engineering and extreme performance but comes at a lower price.
Toyota iQ and Urban Cruiser (2008): first official pictures
Wed, 13 Feb 2008By Tim Pollard First Official Pictures 13 February 2008 12:28 Toyota hasn’t bottled it, thank goodness. This first photograph of the iQ shows that the production version of this fascinating mini has kept all the cheeky charm of last year’s show car, which won CAR’s concept car of the year gong. The iQ at 2007’s Frankfurt Motor Show wowed us for its fresh design, its simplicity and its back-to-basics overhaul of how a small car could be engineered.
Contests Archive: CDN-GM Interactive Design Competition 2011
Thu, 15 Mar 2012The Car Design News - GM Interactive Design Competition was open to design students across the USA and Canada. This was an open, online competition, which was held in the spirit of the web, where data and information are shared and exchanged with ease, and where people could come together to collaborate. In this spirit, the judges were looking to see the contribution the entrants made within the wider online community and how they helped their competition peers. We advised students to engage in dialogue with those who commented on their work, and where they made changes to their design based on feedback they received to illustrate how and why this is so.