Heidts Control Arms Front Upper Steel Black Tubular Narrowed Chevy Pontiac Pair on 2040-parts.com
Tallmadge, Ohio, US
Control Arms & Parts for Sale
- Lower control arm passat 91412 98 99 00 01 02 03 frnt low forward(US $49.99)
- Lower control arm chevrolet van 742906 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 lft frnt(US $79.99)
- Lower control arm silverado 1500 pickup 620204 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 rght(US $64.99)
- Control arm lower rear audi a6 656795 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 rght rear low(US $69.99)
- Upper control arm yukon 755764 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 frnt up lifetime warranty(US $49.99)
- Lower control arm bmw x3 897630 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 rght frnt low frnt(US $94.99)
McLaren P1 (2013): powertrain revealed with 903bhp and electric driving
Wed, 20 Feb 2013McLaren has revealed first details of the P1 supercar's hybrid powertrain. The headlines are: a combined 903bhp, 664lb ft, and the ability to drive 6.3 miles on zero-emission electric power. McLaren P1 powertrain: the details The engine is, as expected, an uprated version of the 12C's 3.8-litre twin-turbo V8.
Drivers 'concerned at lack of goodwill'
Fri, 03 Jan 2014MOTORISTS have been left concerned at the lack of goodwill among other drivers during this festive period, according to research from Halfords Autocentres. The levels of ‘aggressive, impatient and inconsiderate’ driving increase at this time of year, according to the survey of an unspecified number of car owners. Nearly a quarter (23%) of respondents said that things like lane hogging, failing to indicate properly - or at all - and not letting other motorists out at junctions was a real problem at this time of year.
Contests Archive: CDN-GM Interactive Design Competition 2011
Thu, 15 Mar 2012The Car Design News - GM Interactive Design Competition was open to design students across the USA and Canada. This was an open, online competition, which was held in the spirit of the web, where data and information are shared and exchanged with ease, and where people could come together to collaborate. In this spirit, the judges were looking to see the contribution the entrants made within the wider online community and how they helped their competition peers. We advised students to engage in dialogue with those who commented on their work, and where they made changes to their design based on feedback they received to illustrate how and why this is so.