Find or Sell any Parts for Your Vehicle in USA

Rear Brakes Fits 99-04 Grand Cherokee 905 on 2040-parts.com

US $38.79
Location:

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, United States

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, United States
Condition:Used Conditions & Options:BASE,ABS Model:CHERGRAND Genuine OEM:Yes Year:2004 Interchange Part Number:533-02388 Stock #:AA0017 Designation:Used GTIN:Does not apply PartNumber:533 Inventory ID:905 Mileage:177000

Ford design chief J Mays retires, replaced by Moray Callum

Tue, 05 Nov 2013

J Mays, Ford Motor Co.'s global design chief and one of the last senior executives remaining from the Jacques Nasser era, is retiring from the company along with two other veteran senior executives. Moray Callum, 58, design director for Ford in North America, will replace Mays, 59, the automaker said in a statement today. Also retiring after long Ford careers are Jim Tetreault, 57, vice president of North American manufacturing, and Martin Mulloy, vice president of labor relations.

2015 Mercedes CLA Shooting Brake OFFICIALLY confirmed

Sun, 06 Jul 2014

The Mercedes CLA Shooting Brake will arrive in 2015 Mercedes are determined that their new A-Class family of cars will offer something for everyone, and the latest demonstration of that is the official confirmation of the new Mercedes CLA Shooting Brake for 2015. Taking its design cues from the CLS Shooting Brake, the new CLA Shooting Brake will offer a swoopy coupe estate with the emphasis on style rather than load-lugging. Underpinning the new CLA Shooting Brake will be the same platform that underpins the other A-Class models – A-Class, CLA Coupe, GLA SUV and B-Class – and offer the same range of engine and transmission options.

EPA rules greenhouse gases pose danger; more regulation expected

Fri, 17 Apr 2009

The EPA has proposed a finding that greenhouse gases from new vehicles and industrial plants pose a danger to the public, kicking off a process that could result in tighter regulation of carbon dioxide emissions. The EPA's findings come two years after the U.S. Supreme Court ordered the agency to determine whether these emissions contribute to harmful air pollution under the Clean Air Act or whether the science is too uncertain.